Livable Cities - London AMPS | City, University of London Page 70 NOTES 1 Fry, “Design for/by ‘The Global South’”; Dados and Connell, “The Global South.” 2 Manuel and Posluns, “The Fourth World.” 3 Whetstone and Yilmaz, “Recreating the Third World Project: Possibilities through the Fourth World.” 4 Gupta, “Tapping the Entrepreneurial Potential of Grassroots Innovation.” 5 Gupta, “Innovations for the Poor by the Poor.” 6 Mang-Benza et al., “Making Energy Justice Work for Women in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo.” 7 Klintenberg, Wallin, and Azimoh, “Successful Technology Transfer: What Does It Take?” 8 Wamukonya and Davis, “Socio-Economic Impacts of Rural Electrification in Namibia: Comparisons between Grid, Solar and Unelectrified Households.” 9 “Electrifying San Communities with Solar Energy - Green People’s Energy for Africa.” 10 Zeschky, Winterhalter, and Gassmann, “‘Resource-Constrained Innovation’: Classification and Implications for Multinational Firms”; Ray and Ray, “Resource-Constrained Innovation for Emerging Economies: The Case of the Indian Telecommunications Industry”; Baskaran and Mehta, “What Is Innovation Anyway? Youth Perspectives from Resource-Constrained Environments”; Edwards-Schachter, “The Nature and Variety of Innovation.” 11 Klintenberg, Wallin, and Azimoh, “Successful Technology Transfer: What Does It Take?”; Schneider, “Innovative German Technology in Sub-Saharan Africa: Where Is It Used?” 12 De Marchi et al., “Frugal Innovation and Sustainability Outcomes: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review”; Busch, “Frugal Innovation in Energy Transitions: Insights from Solar Energy Cases in Brazil”; Hossain, “Frugal Innovation: Unveiling the Uncomfortable Reality.” 13 Tiwari, “Digital Transformation as Enabler of Affordable Green Excellence: An Investigation of Frugal Innovations in the Wind Energy Sector.” 14 Roysen et al., “Rethinking the Diffusion of Grassroots Innovations: An Embedding Framework.” 15 Mateus and Sarkar, “Bricolage- A Systematic Review, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda.” 16 Ciambotti et al., “Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation in Resource-Scarce Contexts: The Role of Relational Capital and Bricolage in African Social Enterprise”; Papazu, “Entrepreneurial Resource Construction Through Collective Bricolage on Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island: An Ethnographic Study.” 17 Gupta, “Innovations for the Poor by the Poor”; Gupta, “Tapping the Entrepreneurial Potential of Grassroots Innovation.” 18 Jenkins et al., “Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review.” 19 Mang-Benza et al., “Making Energy Justice Work for Women in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo”; Ambole et al., “A Review of Energy Communities in Sub-Saharan Africa as a Transition Pathway to Energy Democracy.” 20 Mang-Benza et al., “Making Energy Justice Work for Women in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo.” 21 “UN SDG Goal 7 Progress and Info.” 22 Mang-Benza et al., “Making Energy Justice Work for Women in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo.” 23 Weko and Goldthau, “Bridging the Low-Carbon Technology Gap? Assessing Energy Initiatives for the Global South.” 24 Ambole et al., “A Review of Energy Communities in Sub-Saharan Africa as a Transition Pathway to Energy Democracy.” 25 “SOLUTIONS MAPPING | United Nations Development Programme.” 26 “Accelerator Labs | United Nations Development Programme.” 27 Lan et al., “From Data to Narratives: Scrutinising the Spatial Dimensions of Social and Cultural Phenomena Through Lenses of Interactive Web Mapping”; Sullivan-Wiley, Short Gianotti, and Casellas Connors, “Mapping Vulnerability: Opportunities and Limitations of Participatory Community Mapping”; Backman and Lööf, “The Geography of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.” BIBLIOGRAPHY “Accelerator Labs | United Nations Development Programme.” Accessed July 28, 2024.
