60 Elmendorf and Luloff: Attitudes of Key Informants About Open Space Conservation Dwyer, J., H. Schroeder, and P. Gobster. 1991. The signifi- cance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper under- standing of values. Journal of Arboriculture 17(10): 276–284. Dwyer, J., G. McPherson, H. Schroeder, and R. Rowntree. 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18(5):227–233. Dwyer, J., D. Nowak, M. Noble, and S. Sisinni. 2000. Con- necting People With Ecosystems in the 21st Century: An Assessment of our Nation’s Urban Forests. U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Dwyer, J., D. Nowak, and M. Noble. 2003. Sustaining urban forests. Journal of Arboriculture 29(1):49–50. Ehlers, L., J. Pfeffer, and C. O’Melia. 2000. Making water- shed management work. Environmental Science & Tech- nology 34(21):453–464. Elmendorf, W., and A.E. Luloff. 2001. Using qualitative data collection methods when planning for community forests. Journal of Arboriculture 25(5):264–273. Fausold, C., and R. Lilieholm. 1996. The economic value of open space. Land Lines (September):32–43. Fortmann, L. 1999. Personal conversation. Rudy Grah Chair in Forestry and Sustainable Development. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, Uni- versity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Fortmann, L., and D. Kusel. 1990. New voices, old beliefs: Forest environmentalism among new and long-standing residents. Rural Sociology 55(2):214–232. Godbey, G., A. Craefe, and S. James. 1992. The Benefits of Local Recreation and Park Services: A Nationwide Study of the Perceptions of the American Public. National Rec- reation and Park Association, Baltimore, MD. Kelsey, T. 1997. Fiscal Impacts of Different Land Uses: The Pennsylvania Experience. College of Agricultural Sci- ences, Cooperative Extension, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. ———. 1998. Tax Fairness: What’s Fair for Our Commu- nity? College of Agricultural Sciences, Cooperative Ex- tension, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Kripperndorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Levine, L. 1980. Land conservation in metropolitan areas. American Planning Association Journal (July):330–338. Luloff, A. 1999. The doing of rural community development research. Rural Sociology 9(1):313–327. Marion, C. 1960. A positive approach to open space preser- vation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners (26): 124–129. McCracken, G. 1988. The Long Interview. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. McHarg, I. 1969. Design With Nature. John Wiley, NY. ©2006 International Society of Arboriculture McMahon, E. 2000. Green infrastructure. Planning Commis- sioners Journal (37):4–7. McPherson, E., D. Nowak, and R. Rowntree. 1994. Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service Northeastern Ex- periment Station, Radnor, PA. Nowak, D., M. Noble, S. Sisinni, and J. Dwyer. 2001. People and trees: Assessing the United States urban forest. Jour- nal of Forestry 99(3):37–42. Park, P., M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, and T. Jackson. 1993. Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada. Bergin and Garvey, NY. Ritchie, J., and L. Spencer. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Brymen, S., and R. Burgess (Eds.). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge, London, UK. Rubins, H., and I. Rubins. 1995. Qualitative Interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. State of Pennsylvania. 1998. Report of the 21st Century En- vironmental Commission. Harrisburg, PA. Towne, M. 1998. Open space conservation in urban environ- ments: Lessons from Thousand Oaks, California. Urban Ecosystems 2(2/3):85–101. Ulrich, R. 1988. Psychological benefits of trees: New re- search findings. Shade Tree. 61(3):13–16. Wilkinson, K. 1991. The Community in Rural America. Greenwood Press, NY. Wilkinson, K., J. Thompson, R. Reynolds, and L. Ostesh. 1982. Local disruption and western energy development. Pacific Sociological Review 25(3):275–297. Wolf, K. 1998. Human Dimensions of the Urban Forest. Cen- ter for Urban Horticulture, University of Washington, Se- attle, WA. William F. Elmendorf (corresponding author) Assistant Professor of Community Forestry Penn State School of Forest Resources 108 Ferguson Building University Park, PA 16802, U.S.
[email protected] A.E. Luloff Professor of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Penn State University University Park, PA 16802, U.S. Résume. Les grands espaces fournissent aux gens ainsi qu’aux endroits où ils vivent de nombreux bénéfices bien documentés très similaires aux arbres et aux autres aménagements paysagers. Sou- vent noyée dans l’arène compliquéedudéveloppement et de la croissance, la planification de la conservation des infrastructures vertes des grands espaces est importante pour des communautés saines. Le processus de préservation des grands espaces procure des
March 2006
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
