Journal of Arboriculture 31(5): September 2005 249 surveys: Empirical evidence of declining rates over time. Soc. Nat. Resour. 16:541–549. Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers (CLTA). 1992. Guide for Plant Appraisal (8th ed). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 41 pp. Dickerson, S., J. Groninger, and J. Mangun. 2001. Influences of community characteristics on municipal tree ordinances in Illinois, U.S. J. Arboric. 27(6):318–325. Dillman, Don A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. Dwyer, J., H. Schroeder, J. Louviere, and D. Anderson. 1989. Urbanites willingness to pay for trees and forests in recreation areas. J. Arboric. 15(10):247–252. Elmendorf, W., and A. Luloff. 2001. Using qualitative data collection methods when planning for community forests. J. Arboric. 27(3):139–151. Gartner, J., T. Treiman, and T. Frevert. 2002. Missouri urban forest—A ten-year comparison. J. Arboric. 28(2):76-83. Groninger, J., D. Close, and C. Basman. 2002. Can small, rural communities practice urban forestry? J. For. 100(1):23–28. Kwak, S., S. Yoo, and S. Han. 2003. Estimating the public’s value for urban forest in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea: A contingent valuation study. Urban Stud. 40(11):2207–2221. Lohr, V., C. Pearson-Mims, J. Tarnai, and D. Dillman. 2004. How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities. J. Arboric. 26(6):319–325. Lorenzo, A., C. Blanche, Y. Qi, and M. Guidry. 2000. Assessing residents’ willingness to pay to preserve the community urban forest: A small-city case study. J. Arboric. 30(1):28–35. Mitchell, R., and R. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. National Arbor Day Foundation. 2005. Tree City USA. www.arborday.org/programs/TreeCityUSA.cfm (accessed 7/28/05). Nowak D.J., M. Noble, S. Sisinni, and J. Dwyer. 2001. People & trees—Assessing the U.S. urban forest resource. J. For. 99(3):37–42. Rocca, J.P. 1992. Survey shows need for city trees. Missouri Municipal Review. 57(4):20–21. Treiman, T., and J. Gartner. 2004. Community forestry in Missouri, U.S.: Attitudes and knowledge of local officials. J. Arboric. 30(4):205–213. Treiman, T., and J. Gartner. 2005. Urban Forestry in Missouri Communities: Attitudes and Knowledge of Missouri Citizens. An Attitude Survey and Analysis for the Missouri Department of Conservation. Missouri Department of Conservation Jefferson City, MO. 55 pp. Tyrväinen, L., and H. Väänänen. 1998. The economic value of urban forest amenities: An application of the contingent valuation method. Landsc.Urban Plann. 43:105–118. 1* Natural Resource Economist Resource Science Division Missouri Department of Conservation 1110 S. College Ave. Columbia MO 65201, U.S.
[email protected] 2 Field Program Supervisor Forestry Division Missouri Department of Conservation P.O. Box 180 Jefferson City, MO, 65102, U.S. *Corresponding author. ©2005 International Society of Arboriculture
September 2005
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Ai generated response may be inaccurate.
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
