106 Hami et al: The Relationship Between Women’s Preferences for Landscape Spatial Configurations LITERATURE CITED Appleton J. 1975. Landscape evaluation: the theoretical vacuum. The transactions of the institute of British geographers. 66:120-123. Berman M, Kross E, Krpan K, Askren M, Burson A, Deldin P, Kaplan S, Sherdell L, Gotlib I, Jonides J. 2012. Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 140:300-305. Buijs AE, Elands BH, Langers F. 2009. No wilderness for immi- grants: cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning. 91(3):113-123. Council of Europe. 2000. Landscape European Convention. Council of Europe, Florence, Italy. De Vaus DA. 2002. Surveys in social research. 5th Edition. London (UK): Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. 379 p. Dowse R, Ehlers MS. 2001. The evaluation of pharmaceutical pictograms in a low-literate South African population. Patient Education and Counseling. 45(2):87-99. Ellis N, Heal O, Dent J, Firbank L. 1999. Pluriactivity, farm household socio-economics and the botanical characteristics of grass fields in the Grampian region of Scotland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 76:121-134. Ferreira S, Moro M. 2013. Income and preferences for the envi- ronment: evidence from subjective well-being data. Environ- ment and Planning A. 45(3):650-667. Ghamari A, Talischi G, Dejdar O. 2015. Analytical approach to investigate the gender and its differences in understanding physical space, case study: cultural centers in Tehran. Armanshahr. 10(21):77-86. Grahn P, Stigsdotter UK. 2010. The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress resto- ration. Landscape and Urban Planning. 95(3-4):264-275. Grühn D, Scheibe S. 2008. Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): do ratings become more extreme with age? Behavior Research Methods. 40:512-521. Hami A, Fazle F, Emami M. 2016. Factors affecting people pref- erences toward environment landscape, case study: shopping mall in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 5(4):108-117. Hami A, Tarashkar M. 2018. Assessment of women’s familiarity perceptions and preferences in terms of plants origins in the urban parks of Tabriz, Iran. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 32:168-176. Hawthorne M, Alabaster T. 1999. Citizen 2000: development of a model of environmental citizenship. Global Environmental Change. 9:25-43. Howley P. 2011. Landscape aesthetics: assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics. 72:161-169. Howley P, Donoghue CO, Hynes S. 2012. Exploring public preferences for traditional farming landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 104:66-74. Hull RB, Stewart WP. 1992. Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 12(2):101-114. Jackson-Smith DB, McEvoy JP. 2011. Assessing the long-term impacts of water quality outreach and education efforts on ©2020 International Society of Arboriculture agricultural landowners. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 17(4):341-353. Joas M, Jahn D, Kern K. 2008. Governing a common sea: envi- ronmental policies in the Baltic Sea region. London (UK): Earth Scan. 257 p. Kaltenborn BP, Bjerke T. 2002. Associations between environmen- tal value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning. 59:1-11. Kaplan R, Kaplan S. 1989. The experience of nature: a psycho- logical perspective. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. 340 p. Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Ryan RL. 1998. With people in mind: design and management of everyday nature. Washington (DC, USA): Island Press. 239 p. Kaplan S, Kaplan R. 1982. Cognition and environment: func- tioning in an uncertain world. New York (NY, USA): Praeger. 287 p. Kaymaz IC. 2012. Landscape perception. In: Ozyavuz M, editor. Landscape Planning. London (UK): IntechOpen. p. 251–276. Lindemann-Matthies P, Briegel R, Schüpbach B, Junge X. 2010. Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: the impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning. 98(2):99-109. Mitra A, Lankford S. 1999. Research methods in park, recreation, and leisure services. Urbana (IL, USA): Sagamore Publishing. 334 p. Molnarova K, Sklenicka P, Stiborek J, Svobodova K, Salek M, Brabec E. 2012. Visual preferences for wind turbines: location, numbers and respondent characteristics. Applied Energy. 92:269-278. Morren M, Grinstein A. 2016. Explaining environmental behavior across borders: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environment Psychology. 47:91-106. Nielsen AB, Heyman E, Richnau G. 2012. Liked, disliked and unseen forest attributes: relation to modes of viewing and cognitive constructs. Journal of Environmental Management. 113:456-466. Rezai G, Mohamed Z, Shamsudin MN. 2011. Malaysian con- sumer’s perception towards purchasing organically produced vegetable. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Economics Research, Malaysia. 9 p. Richardson EA, Mitchell R. 2010. Gender differences in rela- tionships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom. Social Science and Medicine. 71(3):568-575. Soliva R, Hunziker M. 2009. Beyond the visual dimension: using ideal type narratives to analyze people’s assessments of land- scape scenarios. Land Use Policy. 26:284-294. Suhardi M. 2006. A perceptual study of wetlands: implications for wetland restoration in the urban areas in Malaysia [Doctoral Dissertation]. Blacksburg (VA, USA): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 242 p. Torgler B, García Valiñas MA, Macintyre A. 2008. Differences in preferences towards the environment: the impact of a gender, age and parental effect. FEEM Working Paper No. 18.2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105320 Tuncer G, Ertepinar H, Tekkaya C, Sungur S. 2007. Environmen- tal attitudes of young people in Turkey: effects of school type and gender. Environmental Education Research. 11(2):215-233.
March 2020
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Ai generated response may be inaccurate.
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
Your form submission was a success.
Downloading PDF
Generating your PDF, please wait...
This process might take longer please wait
