Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 48(1): January 2022 Nicolai M. 2015 June 5. ‘It was a catastrophe’: Tree with birds’ nests torn down in Newport Beach, angering neighbors. The Orange County Register. Newport Beach (CA, USA): Medi- aNews Group, Inc. [Accessed 2021 April 12]. https://www .ocregister.com/2015/06/05/it-was-a-catastrophe-tree-with -birds-nests-torn-down-in-newport-beach-angering-neighbors Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ. 2020. The increase of impervious cover and decrease of tree cover within urban areas globally (2012–2017). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 49:126638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126638 Nowak DJ, Stevens JC, Sisinni SM, Luley CJ. 2002. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture. 28(3):113-122. O’Herrin K, Wiseman PE, Day SD, Hauer RJ. 2020. Profes- sional identity of urban foresters in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 54:126741. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.ufug.2020.126741 Pena JC de C, Martello F, Ribeiro MC, Armitage RA, Young RJ, Rodrigues M. 2017. Street trees reduce the negative effects of urbanization on birds. PLoS ONE. 12(3):e0174484. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174484 Perry G, Boal C, Verble R, Wallace M. 2020. “Good” and “bad” urban wildlife. In: Angelici F, Rossi L, editors. Problematic wildlife II: New conservation and management challenges in the human-wildlife interactions. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-42335-3_5 Roman LA, Conway TM, Eisenman TS, Koeser AK, Barona CO, Locke DH, Jenerette GD, Östberg J, Vogt J. 2020. Beyond “trees are good”: Disservices, management costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry. Ambio. 50:615-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13280-020-01396-8 Rosenberg KV, Dokter AM, Blancher PJ, Sauer JR, Smith AC, Smith PA, Stanton JC, Panjabi A, Helft L, Parr M, Marra PP. 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. 366(6461):120-124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1313 Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C. 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 11(4):351-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ufug.2012.06.006 Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR. 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(40):16083-16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1211658109 Shannon G, McKenna MF, Angeloni LM, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM, Brown E, Warner KA, Nelson MD, White C, Briggs J, McFarland S, Wittemyer G. 2016. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biological Reviews. 91(4):982-1005. https://doi .org/10.1111/brv.12207 Silvera Seamans G. 2013. Mainstreaming the environmental benefits of street trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12(1):2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.08.004 Strohbach MW, Arnold E, Haase D. 2012. The carbon footprint of urban green space—A life cycle approach. Landscape and Urban Planning. 104(2):220-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.landurbplan.2011.10.013 7 Strohbach MW, Lerman SB, Warren PS. 2013. Are small green- ing areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community- driven greening projects in Boston. Landscape and Urban Planning. 114:69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan .2013.02.007 Threlfall CG, Mata L, Mackie JA, Hahs AK, Stork NE, Williams NSG, Livesley SJ. 2017. Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. Journal of Applied Ecology. 54(6):1874-1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1365-2664.12876 Vogt J. 2018. “Ships that pass in the night”: Does scholarship on the social benefits of urban greening have a disciplinary crosstalk problem? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 32:195-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.010 Vogt J, Fischer BC, Hauer RJ. 2016. Urban forestry and arbori- culture as interdisciplinary environmental science: Importance and incorporation of other disciplines. Journal of Environ- mental Studies and Sciences. 6(2):371-386. https://doi.org/10 .1007/s13412-015-0309-x Wildlife Dangerous Tree Committee of British Columbia. 2019. Wildlife/dangerous trees assessor’s course workbook: Parks and recreation sites course module. British Columbia (Canada): Wildlife Dangerous Tree Committee of British Columbia. 124 p. [Updated 2019 January; Accessed 2021 April 12]. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/plants -animals-and-ecosystems/conservation-habitat-management/ wildlife-conservation/wildlife-tree-committee/parks_wdtac _handbook-revjan2019.pdf Wood EM, Esaian S. 2020. The importance of street trees to urban avifauna. Ecological Applications. 30(7):e02149. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2149 Young RF. 2010. Managing municipal green space for ecosys- tem services. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 9(4):313- 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to the many members and supporters of our coalition over the years, especially our leaders Gillian Martin and Andy Trotter whose hard work and dedication we hope to bring to light with this article. Corinne G. Bassett (corresponding author) Department of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry University of British Columbia Vancouver Campus 2045 – 2424 Main Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada
[email protected] Ryan Gilpin Nidus Consulting Portland, OR, USA Kara Donohue Southern California Edison Rosemeade, CA, USA ©2022 International Society of Arboriculture
January 2022
Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
Empty |
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum