Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40(2): March 2014 CONCLUSIONS This review shows that the scope of scientific studies relying on data from urban tree inventories at sin- gle-tree level has recently expanded in geographi- cal and scientific terms. A notable current trend is the emergence of studies focusing on the ecosystem services provided by urban trees, as a supplement to studies more directly linked to arboricultural management and planning practices. The compara- tive analysis of contemporary inventory methods showed that available technology and current data processing limit the reliability of data obtained from satellite- and airplane-supported inventory methods and on-the-ground scanning or digital photography. The authors therefore recommend further technological development and scientific testing before these methods replace field surveys in urban tree inventory programs at single-tree level. LITERATURE CITED Abd-Elrahman, A.H., M.E. Thornhill, M.G. Andreu, and F. Esc- obedo. 2010. A community-based urban forest inventory using online mapping services and consumer-grade digital images. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoin- formation 12(4):249–260. Adkins, R.V.C., M.R. Kuhns, D.J. Blahna, and M.W. Blood. 1997. Urban forest resource management at Hill Air Force Base, Ogden, Utah. Journal of Arboriculture 23(4):136–143. Andarz, Z., A. Fallah, J. Oladi, and S. Babaii. 2009. Determining the qualification of aerial photos for classification of urban forests case study: Zone six of Tehran. Journal of Environmental Studies 35(50):55–62. Ardila, J.P., W. Bijker, V.A. Tolpekin, and A. Stein. 2012. Context- sensitive extraction of tree crown objects in urban areas using VHR satellite images. ITC Journal. Arroyo, L.A., K. Johansen, J. Armston, and S. Phinn. 2010. Inte- gration of LiDAR and QuickBird imagery for mapping riparian biophysical parameters and land cover types in Australian tropi- cal savannas. Forest Ecology and Management 259(3):598–606. Bassett, J. 1976. Tree-Inventory Systems for Human Settlements. In: J. Anderson (Ed.). Trees and forests for human settlements. pp. 2–14. International Union of forest Research Organisations. PI. 05 Project Group on Arboriculture and Urban Forestry. Center for Urban Forest Studies, University of Toronto. Benjamin, M.T., M. Sudol, D. Vorsatz, and A.M. Winer. 1997. A spatially and temporally resolved biogenic hydrocarbon emis- sions inventory for the California South Coast Air Basin. Atmo- spheric Environment 31(18):3087–3100. Buhyoff, G.J., L.J. Gauthier, and J.D. Wellman. 1984. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science 30(1):71–82. Cavayas, F., Y. Ramos, and A. Boyer. 2012. Mapping Urban Vegeta- tion Cover Using WorldView-2 Imagery. In: S.S. Shen and P.E. Lewis (Eds.). Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery Xviii. 107 Cook, E.A., and L.R. Iverson. 1991. Inventory and change detection of urban land cover in Illinois using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Technical papers ACSM-ASPRS annual convention, Balti- more, 1991. Vol. 3: remote sensing, pp. 83–92. CTLA. 2000. Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers: Guide for Plant Appraisal (9th ed.). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S. Cullen, S. 2002. Tree appraisal: Can deprecation factors be rated greater than 100%. Journal of Arboriculture 28(3):153–158. Diem, J.E., and A.C. Comrie. 2000. Integrating remote sensing and local vegetation information for a high-resolution biogenic emissions inventory: Application to an urbanized, semiarid region. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 50(11):1968–1979. Dimoudi, A., and M. Nikolopoulou. 2003. Vegetation in the urban environment: Microclimatic analysis and benefits. Energy and Buildings 35(1):69–76. Drewitt, G.B., K. Curren, D.G. Steyn, T.J. Gillespie, and H. Niki. 1998. Measurement of biogenic hydrocarbon emissions from vegetation in the lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia. Atmo- spheric Environment 32(20):3457–3466. Escobedo, F., and M. Andreu. 2008. A Community Guide to Urban Forest Inventories. University of Florida, IFAS Extension, 1–4. Geron, C.D., T.E. Pierce, and A.B. Guenther. 1995. Reassessment of biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the Atlanta area. Atmospheric Environment 29(13):1569–1578. Goldberg, P.A. 1981. Remote sensing a potential aid in the prepara- tion of an urban tree inventory. Technical papers of the American society of photogrammetric. Annual meeting. pp. 393–401. Holopainen, M., O. Leino, H. Kämäri, and M. Talvitie. 2006. Drought damage in the park forests of the city of Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4(2):75–83. Hubacek, K., and J. Kronenberg. 2013. Synthesizing different per- spectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1):1–6. i-Tree. 2012. i-Tree. Jansen, L.J.M., G. Carrai, L. Morandini, P.O. Cerutti, and A. Spisni. 2006. Analysis of the spatio-temporal and semantic aspects of land-cover/use change dynamics 1991–2001 in Albania at national and district levels. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 119(1–3):107–136. Jim, C.Y., and H.H.T. Liu. 1997. Storm damage on urban trees in Guang- zhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 38(1–2):45–59. Jutras, P., S.O. Prasher, and G.R. Mehuys. 2009. Prediction of street tree morphological parameters using artificial neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 67(1–2):9–17. Karlik, J.F., and A.M. Winer. 2001. Plant species composition, cal- culated leaf masses and estimated biogenic emissions of urban landscape types from a field survey in Phoenix, Arizona. Land- scape and Urban Planning 53(1–4):123–134. Keller, J.K.K., and C.C. Konijnendijk. 2012. Short communication: A comparative analysis of municipal urban tree inventories of selected major cities in North America and Europe. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38 (1):24–30. Konijnendijk, C.C., A.B. Nielsen, J. Schipperijn, Y. Rosenblad, H. Sander, M. Sarv, and K. Mäkinen, et al. 2007. Assessment of urban forestry research and research needs in Nordic and Baltic countries. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6(4):297–309. ©2014 International Society of Arboriculture
March 2014
Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
Empty |
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
Your form submission was a success. You will be contacted by Washington Gas with follow-up information regarding your request.
This process might take longer please wait