Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 43(6): November 2017 Bosu, P.P., F. Miller, and M.R. Wagner. 2007. Susceptibility of 32 elm species and hybrids (Ulmus spp.) to the elm leaf beetle (Coleop- tera: Chrysomelidae) under field conditions in Arizona. Journal of Economic Entomology 100:1808–1814. Brasier, C.M. 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. novi., causal agent of the current Dutch elm disease pandemic. Mycopathologia 115:151–161. Brasier, C.M. 2000. Intercontinental spread and continuing evalua- tion of Dutch elm disease pathogens. pp. 61–72. In: C.P. Dunn (Ed.). The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Manage- ment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S. 361 pp. Brasier, C.M., and M.D. Mehrotra. 1995. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. Mycological Research 99:205–215. Brasier, C.M., and S.A. Kirk. 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies. Mycological Research 105:547–554. Brasier, C.M., S.A. Kirk, and S. Tegli. 1995. Naturally occurring non cerato-ulmin producing mutants of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi are pathogenic but lack aerial mycelium. Mycological Research 99:436–440. Büchel, K., T. Fenning, J. Gershenzon, M. Hilder, and T. Meiners. 2015. Elm defense against herbivores and pathogens: Mor- phological, chemical, and molecular regulation aspects. Phy- tochemistry Reviews. Accessed 22 April 2015. Buiteveld, J., B. Van Der Werf, and J.A. Hiemstra. 2015. Comparison of commercial elm cultivars and promising Dutch clones for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. iForest—Biogeosciences and Forestry 8:1–7. Campanella, T.J. 2003. Republic of Shade—New England and the American Elm. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S. 228 pp. Ceasar, S.A., and S. Ignacimuthu. 2012. Generic engineering of crop plants for fungal resistance: Role of antifungal genes. Biotech- nology Letters 34:995–1002. Comai, L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being poly- ploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6(11):836–846. Comeau, A.M., J. Dufour, G.F. Bouvet, V. Jacobi, M. Nigg, B. Henris- sat, J. Laroche, R.C. Levesque, and L. Bernier. 2015. Functional annotation of the Ophiostoma novo-ulmi genome: Insights into the phytopathogenicity of the fungal agent of Dutch elm disease. Genome Biology and Evolution 7:410–430. Condra, J.M., C.M. Brady, and D.A. Potter. 2010. Resistance of landscape-suitable elms to Japanese beetle, gall aphids, and leaf miners, with notes on life history of Orchestes alni and Agro- myza aristata in Kentucky. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:101–109. Costello, L.R., S.R. Scott, and C.M. Drake. 2005. A 10-year evalua- tion of the performance of four elm cultivars in California, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 30:114–122. D’Arcy, C.J. 2000. Dutch elm disease. The Plant Health Instructor. American Phytopathological Society. Accessed 12 December 2015. Del Sorbo, F. Scala, G. Parrella, M. Lorito, C. Comparini, M. Ruocco, and A. Scala. 2000. Functional expression of the gene cu, encoding the phytotoxic hydrophobin cerato-ulmin, 231 enables Ophiostoma quercus, a nonpathogen on elm, to cause symptoms of Dutch elm disease. Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction 13:43–53. Dermen, H., and C. May. 1966. Colchiploidy of Ulmus pumila and its possible use in hybridization with U. americana. Forest Sci- ence 12:140–146. Dixon, R.A., L. Achnine, P. Kota, C-J. Jun Liu, M.S. Srinivasa Reddy, and L. Wang. 2002. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defense—A genomics perspective. Molecular Plant Pathology 3:371–390. Duchesne, L.C. 1993. Mechanisms of resistance: Can they help save susceptible elms? pp. 239–254. In: M.B. Sticklen and J.L. Sher- ald (Eds.). Dutch Elm Disease Research: Cellular and Molecular Approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 344 pp. Dunn, C.P. 2000. The Elms: Breeding, Conservation, and Disease Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachu- setts, U.S. 361 pp. Eisele, M. 2015. Resista® Ulmus Resista. Accessed 17 November 2015. Elgersma, D.M. 1970. Length and diameter of xylem vessels as a factor in resistance of elms to Ceratocystis ulmi. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 76:179–182. Elgersma, D.M. 1973. Tylose formation in elms aſter inoculation with Ceratocystis ulmi, a possible resistance mechanism. Neth- erlands Journal of Plant Pathology 79:218–220. Elm Recovery Project 2015. University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Accessed 11 November 2015. Eshita, S.M., J.M. Slavicek, and J.C. Kamalay. 2004. Generation of American elm trees with enhanced tolerance/resistance to Dutch elm disease through genetics. p. 20. In: K.W. Gottschalk (Ed.). Proceedings—U.S. Department of Agriculture interagen- cy forum on gypsy moth and other invasive species. General Technical Report NE-315. Et-Touil, A., C.M. Brasier, and L. Bernier. 1999. Localization of a pathogenicity gene in Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and evidence that it may be introgressed from O. ulmi. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 12:6–15. Et-Touil, A., D. Rioux, F. Mathieu, and L. Bernier. 2005. External symptoms and histopathological changes following inoculation of genetically close strains of Ophiostoma to elms putatively resistant to Dutch elm disease. Canadian Journal of Botany 83:656–667. Forgetta, V., G. Leveque, J. Dian, D. Grove, R. Lyons Jr., S. Genik, C. Wright, S. Singh, N. Peterson, et al. 2013. Sequencing the Dutch elm disease fungus genome using the Roche/454 GS-FLX Tita- nium System in a comparison of multiple genomics core facili- ties. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques 24:39–49. Gartland, K.M.A., A.T. McHugh, R.M. Crow, A. Garg, and J.S. Gartland. 2005. 2004 SIVB Congress symposium proceeding: Biotechnological progress in dealing with Dutch elm disease. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology. Plant 41:364–367. Ghelardini, L., and A. Santini. 2009. Avoidance by early flushing: A new perspective on Dutch elm disease research. iForest— Biogeosciences and Forestry 2:143–153. Guries, R.P., and E. B. Smalley. 1990. Selecting and testing of elms: The Wisconsin elm breeding program. pp. 21–29. In: Proceed- ings of the seventh conference of the Metropolitan Tree Im- provement Alliance—METRIA 7: Trees for the Nineties. The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, 11–12 June 1990. ©2017 International Society of Arboriculture
November 2017
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Ai generated response may be inaccurate.
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
Your form submission was a success.
Downloading PDF
Generating your PDF, please wait...
This process might take longer please wait
