124 Zhang and Zheng: Assessments of Citizen Willingness to Support Urban Forestry Greene, W.H. 1993. Econometric Analysis, 2nd Edition. Macmillan, New York. Hauer, R.J., and G.R. Johnson. 2008. State urban and community forestry program funding, technical assistance, and financial assistance within the 50 United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:280–289. Jim, C.Y., and W.Y. Chen. 2006. Recreation amenity use and contingent valuation of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 75:81–96. Kelman, S. 1981. Cost-benefit analysis: an ethical critique. Regulation 5:74–82. Kim, J. 2002. Assessing practical significance of the proportional odds assumption. Statistics & Probability letters 65:233–239. Lohr, V.I., C.H. Pearson-Mims, J. Tarnai, and D.A. Dillman. 2004. How urban resident rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities. Journal of Arboricultural 30(1):28–35. Lorenzo, A.B., C.A. Blanche, Y. Qi, and M.M. Guidry. 2000. Assessing residents’ willingness to pay to preserve the community urban forest: A small-city case study. Journal of Arboriculture 26(6):319–324. Majumdar, S., and Y. Zhang. 2009. Market for green signaling. The Busi- ness Review, Cambridge 13(2):87–92. McCullagh, P. 1980. Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 42:109–142. McPherson, E.G., J.R. Simpson, P.J. Peper, and Q. Xiao. 1999. Benefit- cost analysis of modesto’s municipal urban forest. Journal of Arbori- culture 25(5):235–248. Orland, B., J. Vining, and A. Ebreo. 1992. The effect of street trees on perceived values of residential property. Environment and Behavior 24(3):298–325. Sagoff, M. 1988.The economy of the earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Saz-Salazar, S., and L. Garcia-Menendez. 2001. Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in a large city. Environmental and Re- source Economics 20:103–112. Sen, A. 1995. Environmental evaluation and social choice: contingent val- uation and the market analogy. Japanese Economic Review 46:23–37. Sommer, R., F. Learey, J. Summit, and M. Tirrell. 1994. The social ben- efits of resident involvement in tree planting. Journal of Arboriculture 20:170–175. Straka, T.J., A.P. Marsinko, and C.J. Childers. 2005. Individual charac- teristics affecting participation in urban and community forestry pro- grams in South Carolina, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 31:131–137. Studer, N. 2003. Urban forest program development in Washington State municipalities. In: C. Kollin (Ed.). 2003 National Urban Forest Con- ference Proceedings, September 17–20, 2003, San Antonio, Texas. Washington, D.C.: American Forests, pp. 21–23. Thompson, R., R. Hanna, J. Noel, and D. Piirto. 1999. Valuation of tree aesthetics on small urban-interface properties. Journal of Arboricul- ture 25(5):225–233. Thompson, R.P., and J.J. Ahern. 2000. The state of urban and community forestry in California: status in 1997 and trends since 1988. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Tree Atlanta. Accessed May 1, 2010.
Tyrvainen, L. 2001. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Fin- land. Journal of Environmental Management 62:75–92. Wang, X., and K.M. Kockelman. 2009. Application of the dynamic spa- tial ordered probit model: Patterns of land development change in Austin, Texas. Papers in Regional Science 88:345–365. Wray, P.H., and D.R. Prestemon. 1983. Assessment of street trees in Io- wa’s communities. Iowa State Journal of Research 58:261–268. Yen, S.T., P.C. Boxall, and W.L. Adamowicz. 1997. An econometric analysis of donations for environmental conservation in Canada. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(2):246–263. Zavoina, R., and W. McElvey. 1975. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociol- ogy pp. 103–120. Zhang, Y., A. Hussain, J. Deng, and N. Letson. 2007. Public attitudes toward urban trees and supporting urban tree programs. Environment and Behavior 39:797–814. Zhang, Y., B. Zheng, B. Allen, N. Letson, J. Sibley. 2009. Tree ordinanc- es as public policy and participation tools: Development in Alabama. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 35(3):166–172. Zheng, B., Y. Zhang, J. Chen. 2011. Preferences to home landscape: wildness vs. neatness. Landscape and Urban Planning 99:1–8. Yaoqi Zhang (correspondence author) School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849, U.S. [email protected] Bin Zheng School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences Auburn University Auburn, AL 36849, U.S. ©2011 International Society of Arboriculture
May 2011
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Ai generated response may be inaccurate.
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
