Journal of Arboriculture 31(4): July 2005 161 Davis, S.H. 1983. Tree valuation pitfalls. J. Arboric. 9(6):164–166. Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA). 2005. Rule 35.2 in Civil Procedure Rules. Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, London, UK. www.dca.gov.uk/civil/ procrules_fin/index.htm (accessed 5/16/05). Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN). 2005. Deutsches Institut für Normung Web site. www2.din.de (accessed 5/16/05). Felt, E.P. 1938. Our Shade Trees. Orange Judd Publishing, New York, NY. 187 pp. ———. 1942. Our Shade Trees (2nd ed.). Orange Judd Publishing, New York, NY. 187 pp. Flook, Ron. 1996. STEM: A Standard Tree Evaluation Method. Ron Flook, Nelson, NZ. 75 pp. Government Printing Office (GPO). 2004. Rule 702, Testimony by Experts, in Federal Rules of Evidence. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Ingram, James. 2004. Open Forum on Suggestions for 10th Edition, at the American Society of Consulting Arborists Annual Conference, 2 Dec. 2004, Philadelphia, PA. International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). 2004. ISA Board- Certified Master Arborist Code of Ethics, in ISA Board- Certified Master Arborist Application Booklet. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 27 pp. Helliwell, D.R. 1967. The amenity value of trees and woodlands. Arboric. J. (1):128–131. ———. 2003. Visual Amenity Valuation of Trees and Woodlands (The Helliwell System) (3rd. ed.). Arboricultural Association Guidance Note 4. The Arboricultural Association, Romsey, Hampshire, UK. International Standards Organization (ISO). 2005. International Standards Organization Web site. www.iso.org (accessed 5/16/05). Kielbaso, J. James. 1971. Economic values of trees in the urban locale, pp. 82–94. In Proceedings of Symposium on the Role of Trees in the South’s Urban Environment, 3 Feb. 1971. University of Georgia, Athens, GA. ———. 1975. Should hardiness zones and location be a part of the ISTC shade tree evaluation formula? J. Arboric. 1(5):93–97. ———. 1979. Evaluation of trees in urban areas. J. Arboric. 5:70–72. Kuhns, Michael. 2003. Species Ratings for Landscape Tree Appraisal in Utah. Utah State University Forestry Extension, Logan, UT. http://extension.usu.edu/forestry/ Reading/Assets/PDFDocs/NR_FF/NRFF001.pdf (accessed 5/16/05). Lewis, Clarence E. (Ed.). 1970 Shade Tree Evaluation, Revision II. International Shade Tree Conference, Urbana, IL. 44 pp. Lorenzo, Alfredo B., Catalino A. Blanche, and James F. Henson. 2003. Concordance among extension workers, researchers, and professional arborists in rating landscape trees. Journal of Extension [online] 41(5) (October). www.joe.org/joe/ 2003october/rb2.shtml (accessed 5/16/05). McMichael, Stanley L. 1951. What are trees worth? Chapter 15, pp. 383–393. In McMichael’s Appraising Manual (4th ed.) Prentice-Hall, New York, NY. National Shade Tree Conference/National Arborist Association (NSTC/NAA). 1957. Shade Tree Evaluation. National Shade Tree Conference, Columbus, OH, and National Arborist Association, Wooster, OH. Published at Wooster, OH. 14 pp. Neely, Dan (Ed.). 1975. A Guide to the Professional Evaluation of Landscape Trees, Specimen Shrubs, and Evergreens, Revision III. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 18 pp. ———. 1979. Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants, Revision IV. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 42 pp. ———. 1983. Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants (6th ed.). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 48 pp. ———. 1988. Valuation of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and other Plants: A Guide to the Methods and Procedures for Appraising Amenity Plants (7th ed.). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 50 pp. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 2005. National Institute of Standards and Technology Web site. www.nist.gov (accessed 5/17/05). Pack, Charles Lathrop. 1922. Legal values of shade trees, Chapter XXI. In Trees As Good Citizens. The American Tree Association, Washington, DC. Price, Colin. 2003. Quantifying the aesthetic benefits of urban forestry. Urban For. Urban Green. 2(1):123–133. Professional Landcare Network (PLANET). 2005. Professional Landcare Network Web site. www.alca.org (accessed 5/17/05). Raad, A. 1976. Trees in towns and their evaluation. Arboric. J. 3(1):2–26. Randrup, T.B., L. Poulsen, and S. Holgersen. 2003. VAT 03— Værdisætning af Træer [Valuation of Trees]. Forlaget Grønt Miljø, Copenhagen. 32 pp. [In Danish]. Rey-Lescure, E. 1985. The location factor and replacement value. J. Arboric. 11(5):132–136. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). 2003. RICS Appraisal and Valuation Standards (Red Book) (5th ed.). RICS Books, Coventry, UK. Roth, Filibert. 1916. Forest Valuation: Michigan Manual of Forestry, Vol. II (1st ed.). Filibert Roth, Ann Arbor, MI. 171 pp. http://chla.library.cornell.edu/c/chla/browse/title/ 2864416.html (accessed 5/18/05). ———. 1925/26. Forest Valuation: Michigan Manual of Forestry, Vol. II (2nd ed., rev.). George Wahr, Ann Arbor, MI. ©2005 International Society of Arboriculture
July 2005
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Ai generated response may be inaccurate.
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
Your form submission was a success.
Downloading PDF
Generating your PDF, please wait...
This process might take longer please wait
