64 Hwang and Wiseman: Geospatial Applications for Urban Tree Canopy Assessment using high-resolution IKONOS imagery. Landscape and Urban Planning 94(2): 94-104. MacFaden, S.W., J.P.M. O’Neil-Dunne, A.R. Royar, J.W.T Lu, and A.G. Rundel. 2012. High-resolution tree canopy mapping for New York City using LiDAR and object-based image analysis. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 6(1): 1-23. McGee, J.A., S.D. Day, R.H. Wynne, and M.B. White. 2012. Using geospatial tools to assess the urban tree canopy: deci- sion support for local government. Journal of Forestry 110(5): 275-286. McPherson, E.G., J.R. Simpson, Q. Xiao, and C. Wu. 2011. Mil- lion trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning 99(1): 40-50. Myeong, S., D.J. Nowak, P.F. Hopkins, and R.H. Brock. 2001. Urban cover mapping using digital high-spatial resolution aerial imagery. Urban Ecosystems 5(4): 243-256. Nowak, D.J., and J.F. Dwyer. 2007. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystem. pp. 25-46. In: J.E. Kuser (Ed.). Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast. Springer, New York, New York, USA. Nowak, D.J., and E.J. Greenfield. 2010. Evaluating the National Land Cover Database tree canopy and impervious cover esti- mates across the conterminous United States: A comparison with photo-interpreted estimates. Environmental Management 46(3): 378-390. Nowak, D.J., and E.J. Greenfield. 2012. Tree and impervious cover change in U.S. cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11(1): 21-30. Nowak, D.J., E.J. Greenfield, R.E. Hoehn, and E. Lapoint. 2013. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and com- munity areas of the United States. Environmental Pollution 178: 229-236. Nowak D.J., R.A. Rowntree, E.G. McPherson, S.M. Sisinni, E.R. Kerkmann, and J.C. Stevens. 1996. Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover. Landscape and Urban Planning. 36(1): 49-57. O’Neil-Duune, J., S. MacFaden, and A. Royar. 2014. A versatile, production-oriented approach to high-resolution tree-canopy mapping in urban and suburban landscapes using GEOBIA and data fusion. Remote Sensing 6(12): 12837-12865. Ott, R.L., and M. Longecker. 2010. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning, Pacific Grove, California, USA. 1273 pp. Parmehr, E.G., M. Amati, E.J. Taylor, and S.J. Livesley. 2016. Estimation of urban tree canopy cover using random point sampling and remote sensing methods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20: 160-171. Richardson, J.J., and L.M. Moskal. 2014. Uncertainty in urban forest canopy assessment: Lessons from Seattle, WA, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13: 152-157. Riemann, R., G. Liknes, J. O’Neil-Dunne, C. Toney, and T. Lister. 2016. Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tree canopy cover across a rural-to-urban gradient in the mid-Atlantic region of the USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 188: 297. Taylor, J.R., and S.T. Lovell. 2012. Mapping public and private spaces of urban agriculture in Chicago through the analysis of high-resolution aerial images in Google Earth. Landscape and Urban Planning 108: 57-70. Ucar, Z., P. Bettinger, K. Merry, J. Siry, J.M. Bowker, and R. Akbulut. 2016. A comparison of two sampling approaches for assessing the urban forest canopy cover from aerial photog- raphy. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 16: 221-230. United States Department of Agriculture. 2015. National Agri- culture Imagery Program (NAIP) Information Sheet. USDA Farm Service Agency, Washington D.C., USA. Accessed July 2018. US Forest Service. 2011. i‐Tree Canopy Technical Notes. US Forest Service, Washington D.C., USA. Accessed July 2018. US Forest Service. 2016. Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Program. US Forest Service, Washington D.C., USA. Accessed July 2018. US Geological Survey. 2017. National Land Cover Database 2011 (NLCD 2011). Accessed July 2018. Virginia Information Technologies Agency. 2016. Orthoimagery. Virginia Information Technologies Agency, Chester, Virginia, USA. Accessed July 2018. Walker, M., A. Sakazaki, R. Eckenrode, and G. Dahle. 2017. Ecosystem Benefits of Tree City USA Cities in West Virginia. West Virginia University, School of Natural Resources, Arboriculture and Urban Forestry Program, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. Walton, J.T. 2008. Difficulties with estimating city-wide urban forest cover change from national, remotely-sensed tree canopy maps. Urban Ecosystems 11(1): 81-90. Walton, J.T., D.J. Nowak, and E.J. Greenfield. 2008. Assessing urban forest canopy cover using airborne or satellite imagery. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(6): 334-340. Watkins, S.L., S.K. Mincey, J. Vogt, and S.P. Sweeney. 2017. Is planting equitable? An examination of the spatial distribution of nonprofit urban tree-planting programs by canopy cover, income, race, and ethnicity. Environment and Behavior 49(4): 452-482 Wiseman, P.E., and J. McGee. 2010. Taking stock: Assessing urban forests to inform policy and management. Virginia Forests Magazine 65(4): 4-7. Xiao, Q., E.G. McPherson, S.L. Ustin, and M.E. Grismer. 2000. A new approach to modeling tree rainfall interception. Jour- nal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 105(D23): 29173-29188. Zhou, W., and A. Troy. 2008. An object-oriented approach for analyzing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29(11): 3119-3135. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding to support this research was made possible in part by the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station and the McIntire ©2020 International Society of Arboriculture
January 2020
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
Your form submission was a success. You will be contacted by Washington Gas with follow-up information regarding your request.
This process might take longer please wait
