Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 42(2): March 2016 de Oliveira, G., and J.A.F. Diniz-Filho. 2010. Spatial patterns of ter- restrial vertebrates richness in Brazilian semiarid, Northeastern Brazil: Selecting hypotheses and revealing constraints. Journal of Arid Environments 74:1418–1426. Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., L.M. Bini, C.M. Vieira, D. Blamires, L.C. Terribile, R.P. Bastos, G. de Oliveira, and B. de Souza Barreto. 2008. Spatial patterns of terrestrial vertebrate species richness in the Brazilian Cerrado. Zoological Studies 47:146–157. Donovan, G.H., and D.T. Butry. 2010. Trees in the city: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Plan- ning 94:77–83. Dormann, C.F., J. Elith, S. Bacher, C. Buchmann, G. Carl, G. Carré, J.R.G. Marquéz, et al. 2013. Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their perfor- mance. Ecography 36:27–46. Dormann, C.F., J.M. McPherson, M.B. Araújo, R. Bivand, J. Bolliger, G. Carl, R.G. Davies, et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A review. Ecography 30:609–628. Dwyer, J.F., E.G. McPherson, H.W. Schroeder, and R.A. Rowntree. 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Jour- nal of Arboriculture 18:227–234. Galvin, M.F., and D. Bleil. 2004. Relationship among tree canopy quantity, community demographics, and Tree City USA pro- gram participation in Maryland, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 30:321–327. Grove, J.M., A.R. Troy, J.P.M. O’Neil-Dunne, W.R. Burch, Jr., M.L. Cadenasso, and S.T.A. Pickett. 2006. Characterization of house- holds and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosys- tems. Ecosystems 9:578–597. Heynen, N.C., and G. Lindsey. 2003. Correlates of urban forest canopy cover: Implications for local public works. Public Works Management & Policy 8:33–47. Kuhns, M.R., B. Lee, and D.K. Reiter. 2005. Characteristics of urban forestry programs in Utah, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 31:285–295. Landry, S.M., and J. Chakraborty. 2009. Street trees and equity: Evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Envi- ronment and Planning A 41:2651–2670. Lohr, V.I., C.H. Pearson-Mims, J. Tarnai, and D.A. Dillman. 2004. How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems as- sociated with trees in cities. Journal of Arboriculture 30:28–35. McFadden, D. 1979. Quantitative model for analyzing travel behav- ior of individuals: Some recent developments. pp. 279–318. In: D.A. Hensher and P.R. Stopher (Eds.). Behavioural travel mod- elling. Groom Helm, London, UK. McPherson, E.G., D. Nowak, G. Heisler, S. Grimmon, C. Souch, R. Grant, and R. Rowntree. 1997. Quantifying urban forest struc- ture, function, and value: The Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems 1:49–61. Perkins H.A., N. Heynen, and J. Wilson. 2004. Inequitable access to urban reforestation: The impact of urban political economy on housing tenure and urban forests. Cities 21:291–299. R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Accessed 23 February 2015.
Rangel, T.F., J.A.F. Diniz-Filho, and L.M. Bini. 2010. SAM: A com- prehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography 33:46–50. Ries, P.D., A.S. Reed, and S.J. Kresse. 2007. The impact of statewide urban forestry programs: A survey of cities in Oregon, U.S. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:168–175. ©2016 International Society of Arboriculture 129 Rosenow, J., and M. Yager. 2007. Tree City USA. pp. 419–427. In: J.E. Kuser (Ed.). Urban and Community Forestry in the North- east. Springer, New York, New York, U.S. Schroeder, H., J. Flannigan, and R. Coles. 2006. Residents’ attitudes toward street trees in the UK and U.S. communities. Arboricul- ture & Urban Forestry 32:236–246. Schwarz, K., M. Fragkias, C.G. Boone, W. Zhou, M. McHale, J.M. Grove, J. O’Neil-Dunne, et al. 2015. Trees grow on money: Urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS ONE 10: e0122051. Stevenson, T.R., H.D. Gerhold, and W.F. Elmendorf. 2008. Attitudes of municipal officials toward street tree programs in Pennsylva- nia, U.S. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:144–151. U.S. Census Bureau. 2014. TIGER/Line with Selected Demographic and Economic Data. Accessed 23 February 2015. . Zhang, Y., and B. Zheng. 2012. Urban trees programs from municipal officials’ perspective: Evidence from Alabama, U.S. Arboricul- ture & Urban Forestry 38:160–167. Adam Berland Department of Geography Ball State University Muncie, Indiana 47306, U.S. Dustin L. Herrmann Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 W Martin Luther King Dr. Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, U.S. Matthew E. Hopton (corresponding author) Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 26 W Martin Luther King Dr. Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, U.S. [email protected]
March 2016
| Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
| Empty |
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
