Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38(6): November 2012 policies. With appropriate support and encouragement, LA tree programs can undoubtedly help improve the quality of life for many New Zealanders. However, there is the concern that un- less action is taken to create the conditions and support that LA officers need, there is a real danger that the tree populations in New Zealand’s towns and cities will steadily erode and devalue. Acknowledgments. Many people have made this study possible. The lo- cal authority officers who took part in the survey have been instrumental to the research and their time and interest is truly appreciated. The New Zealand Arboricultural Association has played a key role in supporting and promoting the study. Rob Graham, Arboriculture Program Manager at the Waikato Institute of Technology, and Dr. Justin Morgenroth, Urban Forestry Researcher/Lecturer at the University of Canterbury have both provided valuable advice and support throughout the study. LITERATURE CITED Booth, J. 2005. Developing a sustainable community strategy for trees. Arboricultural Journal 29:5–18. Britt, C., and M. Johnston. 2008. Trees in Towns II. A new survey of ur- ban trees in England and their condition and management. Research for Amenity Trees No. 9. Department for Communities and Local Government. Clark, J., N. Matheny, G. Cross, and V. Wake. 1997. A model of urban forestry sustainability. Journal of Arboriculture 23(1):17–31. Forest Research. 2010. Benefits of green infrastructure. Report by Forest Research. Forest Research, Farnham. Grey, G. 1996. The Urban Forest: Comprehensive Management. John Wiley and Sons. Hansford, D., T. Jarratt, and K. Rogers. 2011. Torbay’s Urban Forest. Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values. A report on the findings from the UK i-Tree Eco pilot project. Treeconomics, Exeter. Haralambos, M., and M. Holborn. 1995. Sociology: Themes and Per- spectives. 4th ed. Collins Educational. Hayes, B.E. 1997. Measuring Customer Satisfaction – Survey design, use and statistical analysis methods. Milwaukee, ASQ Quality Press. Johnston, M. 2000. British urban forestry in transition: Developments between 1993–1998, part I. Arboricultural Journal 25:59–92. Johnston, M., and B.S. Rushton. 1998. A Survey of urban forestry in Britain, part I: Aims and methods of research. Arboricultural Journal 22:129–146 Johnston, M., and B.S. Rushton. 1999. A Survey of Urban Forestry in Britain. University of Ulster, Ulster. Johnston, M., K. Collins, and B. Rushton. 1999. A Survey of urban for- estry in the republic of Ireland. In: K. Collins (Ed.). Proceedings of Ireland’s Third National Conference on Urban Forestry. The Tree Council of Ireland, Dublin. pp. 72–99. Johnston, M., and L. Shimada. 2004. Urban forestry in a multicultural society. Journal of Arboriculture 30(3):185–191. Kielbaso, J.J., B.S. Beauchamp. K.F. Larison, and C.J. Randall. 1988. Trends in Urban Forest Management. Baseline Data Report, 20(1), International City Management Association, Washington, D.C. Konijnendijk, C.C., K. Nilssoon, T.B. Randrup, and J. Schipperijn (Eds.). 2005. Urban Forests and Trees. Springer, Heildelberg. Kuchelmeister, G. 1998. Urban Forestry in the Asia-Pacific Region: Sta- tus and prospects. APFSOS Working Paper No. 44. FAO, Forestry Policy and Planning Division and Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Rome/Bangkok. 253 Le Claire, A. 2009. A review of tree management policies at North Shore City Council, Auckland, New Zealand. Unpublished project com- pleted for the Diploma in Arboriculture at the Waikato Institute of Technology, New Zealand. Local Government New Zealand. 2010. Local Government in profile. Accessed 07/20/2010. Ministry for the Environment. 1991. Resource Management Act. New Zealand Government. Ministry for the Environment. 2002. Land Cover Database (LCDB). Accessed 01/26/2011. Oppenheim, A.N. 1992. Questionnaire Design: Interviewing and Atti- tude Measurement. London, Pinter Publishers. Population Reference Bureau. 2010. World population data sheet. Accessed 01/24/2011. Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners-Researchers. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Rogers, K. 2010. Who said money doesn’t grow on trees? Tree News, Autumn/Winter 2010. pp. 24–25. Rowntree, R.A. 1995. Towards ecosystem management. Shifts in the core and the context of urban forestry ecology. In: G.A. Bradley (Ed.). Urban Forest Landscapes: Integrating Multidisciplinary Per- spectives. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, U.S. Schwab, J. (Ed.). 2009. Planning the Urban Forest: Ecology, Economy and Community Development. Planning and Advisory Report num- ber 555. American Planning Association, Chicago, Illinois, U.S. Serwylo, A. 2010. Changes in the tree cover in residential areas of Ham- ilton, New Zealand. Unpublished project completed for the Diploma in Arboriculture at the Waikato Institute of Technology, New Zealand. Statistics New Zealand. 2010. New Zealand in profile: An overview of New Zealand’s people, economy and environment. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington. Stobbart, M. 2011. Managing trees in and around Aotearoa’s towns and cities: A survey of urban forestry in New Zealand. Pub- lished dissertation. ac.uk/?page=subjects-arboriculture-matthew-stobbart-dissertation> Van Wassenaer, P., A. Satel, W.A. Kenny, and M. Ursic. 2012. A frame- work for strategic urban forest management and monitoring. In: M. Johnston and G. Percival (Eds.). Trees, People and the Built Environ- ment. Forestry Commission Research Report. Forest Commission, Edinburgh. Wheater, C.P., and P.A. Cook. 2000. Using Statistics to Understand the Environment. London, Routledge. Wilson, N., and S. McClean. 1996. Questionnaire Design: A Practical Introduction. Ulster, University of Ulster. Matthew Stobbart Arborist New Zealand [email protected] Mark Johnston, Ph.D. Research Fellow Arboriculture and Urban Forestry Myerscough College Bilsborrow, Preston, PR3 ORY, UK [email protected] Accessed 01/30/2012.