84 Bancks et al.: Volunteer- and Researcher-Collected Urban Tree Inventory Data Crall, A.W., G.J. Newman, T.J. Stohlgren, K.A. Holfeder, J. Graham, and D.M. Waller. 2011. Assessing citizen science data quality: An invasive species case study. Conservation Letters 4:433–442. Darwall, W.T., and N.K. Dulvy. 1996. An evaluation of the suit- ability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Biological Conservation 78:223–231. Delaney, D.G., C.D. Sperling, C.S. Adams, and B. Leung. 2007. Marine invasive species: Validation of citizen science and impli- cations for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions 10(1):117–128. Dickinson, J.L., B. Zuckerberg, and D.N. Bonter. 2010. Citizen sci- ence as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41:149–172. Elmendorf, W.F., V.J. Cotrone, and J.T. Mullen. 2003. Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability: Con- trasting a Pennsylvania, U.S., study. Journal of Arboriculture 29(4):237–248. Elzinga, C., R.C. Schearer, and G. Elzinga. 2005. Observer varia- tion in tree diameter measurements. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 20(2):134–137. Engel, S.R., and J.R. Voshell Jr. 2002. Volunteer biological monitor- ing: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? American Entomologist 48(3):164–177. Fernandez-Gimenez, M.E., H.L. Ballard, and V.E. Sturtevant. 2008. Adaptive management and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community- based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society 13(2):4. Fitzpatrick, M.C., E.L. Preisser, A.M. Ellison, and J. Elkinton. 2009. Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations. Ecological Applications 19(7):1673–1679. Fore, L.S., K. Paulsen, and K. O’Laughlin. 2001. Assessing the per- formance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biol- ogy 46:109–123. Foster-Smith, J., and S.M. Evans. 2003. The value of marine eco- logical data collected by volunteers. Biological Conservation 113:199–213. Frelich, L.E. 1992. Predicting dimensional relationships for Twin Cities shade trees. St Paul: University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources. Galloway, A.W., M.T. Tudor, and W.M. Vander Haegen. 2006. The reliability of citizen science: A case study of Oregon white oak stand surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(5):1425–1429. Gillet, D.J., D.J. Pondella, J. Freiwald, K.C. Schiff, J.E. Caselle, C. Schuman, and S.B. Weisberg. 2012. Comparing volunteer and professionally collected monitoring data from the rocky subtid- al reefs of Southern California, USA. Environmental Monitor- ing and Assessment 184(5):3239–3257. Hager, M.A., and J.L. Brudney. 2004. Volunteer management prac- tices and retention of volunteers. The Urban Institute, Washing- ton, D.C. Heiskary, S., J. Lindbloom, and C.B. Wilson. 1994. Detecting water quality trends with citizen volunteer data. Lake and Reservoir Management 9(1):4–9. Hursh, C.R., and F.W. Haasis. 1931. Effects of 1925 summer drought on Southern Appalachian Hardwoods. Ecology 12(2):380–386. Jack-Scott, E., M. Piana, B. Troxel, C. Murphy-Dunning, and M.S. Ashton. 2013. Stewardship success: How community group dynamics affect urban street tree survival and growth. Arbori- culture & Urban Forestry 39(4):189–196. Jaenson, R., N. Bassuk, S. Schwager, and D. Headley. 1992. A statis- tical method for the accurate and rapid sampling of urban street tree populations. Journal of Arboriculture 18(4):171–183. Kenney, W.A., P.J. van Wassenaer, and A.L. Safel. 2011. Criteria and indicators for strategic urban forest planning and management. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37(3):108–117. Krejcie, R.V., and D.W. Morgan. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30:607–610. Leslie, L.L., C.E. Velez, and S.A. Bonar. 2004. Utilizing volunteers on fisheries projects. Fisheries 29(10):10–14. Mattson, M.D., M.F. Walk, P.A. Kerr, A.M. Slepski, O.T. Zajicek, and P.J. Godfrey. 1994. Quality assurance testing for a large scale vol- unteer monitoring program: The acid rain monitoring project. Lake and Reservoir Management 9:10–13. McLaren, M.A., and M.D. Cadman. 1999. Can novice volunteers provide credible data for bird surveys requiring song identifica- tion? Journal of Field Ornithology 70(4):481–490. McRoberts, R.E., J.T. Hahn, G.J. Heſty, and J.R. Van Cleve. 1994. Variation in forest inventory field measurements. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24:1766–1770. Minnesota Department of Agriculture. 2017. Landscape Pests. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2016. Ecological Classification System. Newman, C., C.D. Buesching, and D.W. MacDonald. 2003. Vali- dating mammal monitoring methods and assessing the perfor- mance of volunteers in wildlife conservation—“Sed quis custo- diet ipsos custodies?”. Biological Conservation 113:189–197. Nicholson, E., J. Ryan, and D. Hodgkins. 2002. Community da- ta-where does the value lie? Assessing confidence limits of community collected water quality data. Water Science and Technology 45(11):193–200. North, E.A. 2013. Predictive Equations for Crown Diameter and Trunk Flare Diameter at Ground Line for Four Urban Land- scape Tree Species in Minnesota (unpublished master’s thesis). University of Minnesota–St. Paul. Penrose, D., and S.M. Call. 1995. Volunteer monitoring of benthic macroinvertebrates: Regulatory biologists’ perspectives. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14(1):203–209. Ponce-Donoso, M., O. Vallejos-Barra, and F.J. Escobedo. 2017. Ap- praisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 43(2):72–82. R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Rock, B.N., and G.N. Lauten. 1996. K-12th grade students as active contributors of research investigations. Journal of Science Edu- cation and Technology 5(4):255–266. Roman, L.A., B.C. Scharenbroch, J.P. Osterber, L.S. Mueller, J.G. Hennins, A.K. Koeser, and R.C. Jordan. 2017. Data quality in citizen science urban tree inventories. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 22:124–135. ©2018 International Society of Arboriculture
March 2018
Title Name |
Pages |
Delete |
Url |
Empty |
Search Text Block
Page #page_num
#doc_title
Hi $receivername|$receiveremail,
$sendername|$senderemail wrote these comments for you:
$message
$sendername|$senderemail would like for you to view the following digital edition.
Please click on the page below to be directed to the digital edition:
$thumbnail$pagenum
$link$pagenum
Your form submission was a success. You will be contacted by Washington Gas with follow-up information regarding your request.
This process might take longer please wait